55 mph, again
Advertisement
Text size: small | medium | large
By Published by The Editorial Board
Published: July 17, 2008
In the 13 years since the 55 mph national speed limit was raised, Americans have voted with their right feet.
Today, traffic moves a lot faster on interstate and limited-access highways. Even U.S. highways such as 58 and 29 have slightly higher speed limits than the dreaded double nickel.
But $4-a-gallon gas has made the cost of energy a national issue. One of the easiest ways to save gas and money with the current technology — that is, today’s cars and trucks — is to simply drive slower.
Is it time to return to the mandatory 55 mph speed limit?
U.S. Sen. John Warner, R-Va., has written to Energy Secretary Samuel W. Bodman asking what the most efficient speed for today’s vehicles is, how much could be saved if the national speed limit were lowered to that speed and how much of a savings we could expect to see at the gas station.
Warner is right that automobiles have undergone “significant technological improvements” since 1974, so 55 mph may not bring the same savings it did almost 35 years ago.
“In my view, new conservation efforts are the quickest way to see an immediate reduction in the price of gas at the pump,” Warner wrote. “The American public is already doing its part through individual means of cutting back.”
But there is a world of difference between a driver making the choice to slow down to save gas and everyone having to slow down because Washington lowered the national speed limit.
As long as gas hovers around $4 per gallon, no one needs to be reminded how much more expensive driving has become. But if someone wants to drive at 65 mph or even 75 mph with “today’s technology” — and they’re willing to pay the price that comes from driving that fast — isn’t that really the best short-run solution?
The federal government should let people who want to buy more $4-per-gallon gas do so by keeping today’s higher speed limits in place. Nothing has done more to stoke interest in energy conservation than those higher prices everyone hates. The market has been working on this problem. Let’s keep it on the job.
Page 1 of 1
Post a Comment
(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Report Inappropriate Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.
Reader Reactions
Posted by ( Vindicator ) on July 21, 2008 at 11:29 am
Smoke Screen well said! When will we ever learn that if you keep doing the same thing over and over again, you will continue to get the same results. Voters in EVERY state must learn to vote for the good of the country, not the party. Then and only then will we realize change for the better! Until then we will keep getting the same old non working proposals. Think about it. If you drive 55MPH, you are STILL paying $4 a gallon for fuel. The cost of EVERYTHING is STILL going to remain the same. The ONLY thing that will change is the fact that it takes some people longer to arrive at the truth!
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( The Truth ) on July 17, 2008 at 8:25 pm
What do you expect from a Democrat that has been calling himself a Republican. Warner has always been a fool. He married Liz Taylor before she became a whacko and we voted for her. But I do not think we will make that mistake again. The problem with the political system is that you are sometimes stuck with someone like Warner because he is the lesser of the two evils.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Smoke Screen ) on July 17, 2008 at 6:55 am
WE THE PEOPLE! need to tell those old men in Washington to take their Meds and retire.This stupid Idea has been tried once,and failed.They wont do a thing to help with getting us more Fuel,so its just slow down.Thomas Jefferson said Washington needed to be cleaned out every five years.If they are up for re-election,vote them out.We need new Ideas,not the same ones repeated every thirty years.
Report Inappropriate Comment