Danville City Council considers options for utility relief
Advertisement
Text size: small | medium | large
By Denice Thibodeau
Published: November 18, 2008
Danville City Councilman Larry Campbell is proposing a 1 percent raise on the city’s lodging tax to provide extra funds for utility bill relief for the poor and/or elderly.
He contends the increase from 3 to 4 percent would add $135,000 to the Energy Crisis Assistance Program administered by the Department of Social Services.
Councilman Buddy Rawley said during a work session Tuesday he didn’t feel the tax for hotel and motel rooms should be used for programs other than tourism, and suggested having the funds come from utilities income.
Interim City Manager Lyle Lacy said city contributions for such a program would come from the general fund, which is what the increase in lodging taxes would go into. He also noted that Social Services already handles the program for federal funds received for that purpose.
Mayor Sherman Saunders said need is great for the utility assistance, though several organizations in the area also try to provide relief.
“Let’s find a way to help people,” he said. “It’s still not enough, but it will help some people.”
Councilman Gary Miller said he felt the request is a modest increase that will help some people with their heating costs.
“The city needs to chip in and help,” Miller said.
Campbell, who also is the assistant pastor at Bibleway Worldwide Church, said he gets many calls every day from people who need help, and thinks this is one way to help with the problem when the city’s budget is already tight.
“I’m trying to think of ways to help people when the city has done all it can do,” Campbell said.
The issue is scheduled to come before council officially on Dec. 2 with a public hearing and final vote set for Dec. 16.
Regional One EMS also wants to raise rates for its service, but must get council approval.
Tim Duffer, director of Regional One EMS, said during Tuesday’s work session that the company normally raises rates every five years when its permit is renewed, but said rising across-the-board costs mean the company needs to raise its prices.
Various transportation fees would be raised between 8 and 16 percent.
Duffer said the company’s fuel costs have risen since the last increase in early 2007. Despite the recent drop in gasoline prices, the vehicles use diesel fuel and Duffer wants mileage rates raised from 21 to 26 percent a mile. This means that in addition to the above rate increases, mileage rates would be raised to between $12.09 and $23.52 a mile.
While council could have approved the increase, many members said they felt a second increase in less than two years should be heard by the public and they voted to bring the issue into a regular council meeting for a public hearing.
Contact Denice Thibodeau at or (434) 791-7985.
Page 1 of 1
Post a Comment
The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.
Reader Reactions
Posted by ( wake up ) on November 21, 2008 at 9:54 am
I agree lets for once help the people who help themseleves ( the working class) We can’t even buy groceries pay utilities and make a house payment. And I’m not talking about the elderly they need help and I’m all for it but the people who can work should. We could also allow other utility co. in so there would be some competition. As for Regional One they just got help from the city and they don’t need anymore of our tax dollars.Our utility bill runs between 300.00 and 400.00 a month. This is outragous I’m starting to think something is wrong in the City of Danville Treasury.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( TaleGator ) on November 20, 2008 at 7:54 am
Jimmystick, I have an elderly relative who lives in “a neighborhood in transition”. In the language of political correctness, that means the working people have fled to the county and the houses are slowly becoming section 8 rental property. Anyway, he tells the story of a very cold day last winter. He was bundled up in a T-shirt, a sweatshirt, and a jacket so as not to turn the furnace up and waste money. He looks out the window and the girl in the section 8 house across the street comes outside to put her garbage in the can. She’s wering shorts and a T-shirt. And, surprise surprise, she and her brood get fuel assistance. She has no incentive to conserve, as she’s not paying the freight anyway.
I’m afraid this new program will simply foster this behavior at the expense of tourism. Again, I would LOVE to be proven wrong.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( jimmystick ) on November 19, 2008 at 8:13 pm
TaleGator sounds like you live in my nieghborhood. I think you nailed it about the type of program they need. But be rest assured that they will make it easy for the undeserving to get more help than the ones who really need it. I just love to drive by Govt Housing Projects and see how well the ones are doing with the big wheels and SUV’s that drink gas. Most of these we are already paying most of their utility bill so why let them pay that minimum when we could pay all of it for them. These are probably the ones who will benefit the most while the elderly and truly needy get NOTHING.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( TaleGator ) on November 19, 2008 at 7:08 am
I have nothing at all against helping those truly in need, but I fear this program will simply allow people to get their utilities paid while using their own money for lifestyle purchases. It appears this program, which will transfer wealth from the makers to the takers, will pass. I’d like to see a very stringent program in place to weed out those who have cell phones, cable or satellite TV, a car newer than 5 years old, regular hair and nail appointments, $5,000 rims, and boomin’ systems that wake me up at 3 AM, (just to name a few) but I really believe it’ll become yet another disincentive to an honest day’s work. City Council, please, please prove me wrong!
Report Inappropriate Comment