Wife of Danville councilman to appeal trade-secret decision
Advertisement
Text size: small | medium | large
By Denice Thibodeau
Published: May 2, 2008
By DENICE THIBODEAU
Register & Bee staff writer
Robin Tomer has filed an appeal to the Supreme Court of Virginia against the jury decision that found her guilty of Virginia Trade Secrets Act infringements against her former employer, Romar Medequip.
Romar Medequip was awarded $175,000 in damages by the jury in the February trial. Tomer was awarded $4,000 in compensatory damages for money she said the company owed her.
After the trial, Tomer’s attorney, Joseph Garrett, filed motions asking for a mistrial as well as a new trial, and for the court to set aside the verdict for insufficient evidence, to strike the evidence and to exclude the testimony of one of Romar’s witnesses.
On March 17, Romar’s attorneys, Glenn Pulley and W. Huntington Byrnes, filed a motion asking for an accelerated hearing because Tomer and her husband, Danville City Councilman Adam Tomer, transferred ownership of their home to John C. Tomer on March 4.
Their motion said, “The deed … purports to be both a deed of bargain and sale and a deed of gift. It is unknown at this time whether or not Adam J. Tomer and Robin G. Tomer actually received consideration for the transfer, but it is clear that the Grantors reported the sale price of $91,000.00 to the Clerk.”
The motion further said, “The timing of the transfer shortly after the verdict was rendered but before the judgment has been entered, is suspicious at the least. Romar has a right to an expeditious rendering of the judgment before Tomer disposes of her assets to avoid paying the judgment. The property transferred was finite, certain, and subject to any judgment.”
An earlier court date was not granted, the motions were heard on April 7, and a Judgment Order was filed, ordering Robin Tomer to pay Romar $171,000.
The appeal was filed on April 25; as of Friday, it was unknown if the Supreme Court of Virginia would agree to hear the case and a court date had not been set.
Contact Denice Thibodeau at or (434) 791-7985.
Page 1 of 1
Reader Reactions
Posted by ( CeeCee ) on May 07, 2008 at 6:20 pm
Call it suspicious if you want, but what Mrs. Tomer did was obviously legal. The transaction had moved through the system before the judgment was handed down. Too bad for Romar. I feel like Mrs. Tomer brought the lost practice of good customer service with her to Romar, and attracted clients with her personality. Mrs. Tomer had a client base that clearly felt a strong devotion to her. There was no need for her to �steal� client files, as her customers would follow her without persuasion.
Shame on Romar for blaming their own failures on one young woman.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( curious ) on May 06, 2008 at 11:11 pm
could not agree more!!!
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( news_u_can_use ) on May 03, 2008 at 7:05 am
Looks very suspicious when a somebody loses a court case like this, and then begins selling assets.
Report Inappropriate Comment